PERSONALITY TEST · FREE · NO REGISTRATION

Are you right-handed or left-handed inside your brain?

Try to imagine for a second that every person you meet today, the tram driver, a colleague, your father, lives inside a brain built completely differently. They recharge differently, they decide differently and different things annoy them. What you take to be “normal thinking” is something completely foreign to them.

That’s why we so often misunderstand each other. It isn’t ill will, we’re just talking to each other from heads that are built differently.

Just as you have an innate dominant hand, you have an innate setting of the mind. That’s why I call personality typology a translator for brains. Once you understand it, it’s like putting on 3D glasses: you start to see what really charges you and what drains you, why you decide the way you decide, and why the people around you react the way they react.

🧠 65 questions · ~10 minutes🧭 3 independent measurements in one🔒 Result straight away, no e-mail
🔖 You have a test in progress ().
INTRO 2/3

What this is about (in 90 seconds)

The psychologist Carl Gustav Jung noticed a hundred years ago that the human mind takes in information and makes decisions in several different ways. He described 8 cognitive functions and their combinations add up to 16 types, which you know today as four-letter codes (INFP, ESTJ…).

Most online tests stop at four letters. We’ll go deeper, down to the functions a type is made of. Two “similar” codes (INTP and INTJ, say) share three letters, but not a single function. They are completely different heads.

Te · Drive for resultsorganises the world outside: goals, systems, done
Ti · Inner logictakes things apart inside: precision, understanding, why
Fe · A feel for peopletunes the atmosphere: relationships, harmony, we
Fi · Inner compassguards values: authenticity, what is right, I
Se · Here and nowlives through the senses: action, detail in real time
Si · Memory and certaintybuilds on the proven: experience, rituals, stability
Ne · A fan of possibilitiesfires off ideas: what if, connecting, beginnings
Ni · Inner visionmelts impressions into a conclusion: direction, aha moments, depth

You use all eight, but four are in your natural kit and one of them leads. That’s the one we’ll be looking for.

For sceptics (click if this smells like a horoscope to you)
Distrust is in order here. Let’s put it to the test. Fortune tellers and bad tests use a trick called the Barnum effect: they write a text so vague that it fits everyone. For example: “You like it when people appreciate you, but you can also be self-critical. Sometimes you’re sociable, other times you need quiet.”, Does it fit? Sure. It fits everyone.

Good typology does the opposite: “Deadlines charge you up, you take rules as recommendations and you feel best in action without a plan” versus “without a plan you don’t feel free, you feel uneasy, and people who leave everything to the last minute wear you out”. Both can’t be true at once. With most of the 16 descriptions you’ll say “this really isn’t me”, and that’s exactly what tells a mirror apart from a horoscope.

And one more thing: serious psychology has legitimate objections to the 16 types, mainly to the shallow internet versions. That’s why we go to the cognitive functions, not to memes, and why you should take the result as a map, not a verdict.
INTRO 3/3

How to answer so the result fits

1 · Answer as your natural self. Not as the role you play at work, not as the person you “should be”. A trick helps: how would you behave if nobody was watching? How did you behave as a child, before the world told you what was proper? For half a year I kept coming out as INTJ myself. The type I wanted to be, not the one I am. A mirror shows only what you put in front of it.

2 · Compare yourself with the average person, not with your ideal. If you’re the most imaginative person in every room, you are imaginative. Even if you compare yourself with Da Vinci and feel lazy.

3 · The middle is allowed. When both options fit or neither does, pick the middle circle. Just go easy on it, because the clearer you answer, the sharper the result.

4 · The options aren’t opposites. Often they are two different tastes, not a right and a wrong answer. Pick the one that comes more naturally to you, not the one that sounds better.

P. S. Tiredness, a hard patch or trauma can colour the result. You then answer as your “surviving self”, not as your natural one. If nothing fits, come back to the test another time and take the top three types as a shortlist, not as a verdict.

Your result

Your 5 dichotomies

3 measurements, 1 result

Types ranked by how well they match your answers. Take the score as a comparison between types, not as a grade. Read the top three and get to know yourself.

How to read the score (and why these aren’t percentages of match with a type)
First you get five percentages, your place between the two poles of each dichotomy (extraversion/introversion and so on). On top of that three independent measurements: the direct answers, a temperament probe and a function probe, and you can see whether they point the same way. Only out of that does the ranking of all 16 types come together: the closer a type is to your final letters and the more it matches your dominant function and temperament, the higher it moves. It isn’t “what percentage INFP are you”, it’s a comparison of how much better one type fits you than another. When the top types are close together, read them all and decide by the descriptions, not by tenths of a point.
Why people often don’t get it right the first time
The four most common reasons: 1) The role. You answer as yourself at work; after ten years in a corporate half the world tests as xSTJ. 2) Upbringing. The “well-behaved child” learned to switch into the mode the parents rewarded. 3) The ideal. You answer as the person you want to be. 4) A hard patch. Stress and trauma pull you towards survival patterns. It helps to remember yourself at the age of ten, and to take the test again in a month.
A mature and an immature type are not the same thing
Every type exists at hundreds of levels of maturity. An immature “Spark” (ENFP) starts things and doesn’t finish them; a mature one sets whole communities alight and can see things through as well. An immature “Strategist” (INTJ) is an arrogant loner; a mature one builds systems that outlive him. The type doesn’t tell you how good a person you are, it tells you which way your path of growth runs. And one more thing: the type is not an excuse. “I’m a P, so I just turn up late” doesn’t hold; the setting explains, it doesn’t excuse.
A request: don’t put anyone in a box (yourself included)
Typology is a map, not the territory. It says nothing about your intelligence, your worth or who you should love. When you meet a person of an “incompatible type”, don’t close the door; the best pairs tend to be the ones that learned to translate each other. That’s exactly why I call it a translator for brains, not a sorter of people.

Want to talk it through?

The test showed you the setting. What that means for your decisions, your relationships and your work, that’s a longer conversation, and that’s exactly what I do with people in sessions. If you’d like to talk about your result, the first 20 minutes are free and commit you to nothing.

Or pick a time right away →
🧭 Carry on with deeper questions36 questions about direction, meaning and legacy, with a plan at the end. For the moments when you’re looking for more than a type. ⚖️ Facing a specific dilemma?An online version of the two-sheets exercise I do with clients in sessions. 🔬 How the test works and what exactly it measures 🔍 Introvert × extravertMini-test on 7 shades (28 questions) + article 🔭 Intuitive × sensorMini-test on 5 shades (20 questions) + article ⚖️ Feeling × thinkingMini-test on 5 shades (20 questions) + article 🗂️ Planner × perceiverMini-test on 5 shades (20 questions) + article 🎯 Assertive × turbulentMini-test on 5 shades (20 questions) + article

The test is based on C. G. Jung’s cognitive functions and the model of 16 types. It isn’t the official MBTI® (a trademark of The Myers-Briggs Company); the questions, the algorithm and all the descriptions are my own, written after years of working with typology with clients. No type is better than another and no test knows you better than you do. Take it as a map and a mirror, not as a box you have to fit into.

Link copied ✓